Court of Accounts
Republic of Moldova
During the meeting on the 26th of November this year, the Court of Accounts of the Republic of Moldova (CoARM) has examined the Report of the follow-up mission regarding “The evaluation of the implementation of the requirements and recommendations submitted by the Decision of the Court of Accounts nr. 2 from 13.02.2018 regarding the Report on the compliance audit regarding the bookkeeping, recording and managing of the public assets as well as regarding the taxing of the real estate”.
The general target of the mission was for the audit team to evaluate the way the requirements and recommendations of the Court of Accounts were approached and implemented, as well as the results of the implementation.
The last audit highlighted major lacks within the identification, delimitation, recording and bookkeeping of the public assets and managing the public patrimony.
In order to address the situations mentioned above, the Court of Accounts through the Decision nr.2 from 13.02.2019 has disposed 119 requirements and recommendations towards 13 entities.
The follow-up mission has determined that even though the process of implementation of the requirements and recommendations was at a low level, the entities have given their best and have achieved certain progress.
Although there were taken all the necessary measures in order to remove the lacks determined by the previous audit, the entities did not fully strive to eliminate all of the lacks identified. Therefore, only 23% of the requirements and recommendations were implemented, 48% were partially implemented and 29% were not implemented at all.
The activity of the Cadaster and Land Relations Agency (CLRA), the Cadaster Department within the Public Service Agency and the Public Property Agency regarding the implementation and coordination of the State Programs include: creating the cadaster of the real estate, bounding the public property terrains and implementing the new evaluation system of the real estate in order to tax them and add the financial resources to the state budget. Following the evaluation of the activity mentioned above it can be concluded that there is a low level of implementing due to the lack of financial resources and to the constant changes in the institutional and legal framework. As a result, the reform of the central public authorities has dispersed certain domains that were within the CLRA until 2017. The “Cadaster” State Company has become a part of the Public Institution “Public Services Agency”, even if the main cadastral politics are drafted by CLRA. The Projecting and Organization of the Territory Institute as well as the politics regarding the bounding of the public property are already administrated by the Public Property Agency. Simultaneously, the bounding is a part of the cadastral work so the drafting of the politics in this domain is being done by the PPA as well as by the CLRA.
According to the data offered by the Cadaster Department until 01.01.2019:
The Public Property Agency din not compile the complete inventory of the terrains that represent a public property of the state and those that are linked to the private real estates. However, the follow-up mission doubts the rightness of the data included in the lists of state’s public property terrains that are managed by the Public Property Agency, as stated by the Government Decision from mart 2019. The doubts due to the fact that there was found a total of 2 thousand acres of different terrains that have the same cadastral number. More than that, for 5,3 thousand acres of state’s public property terrains that are linked to private real estate and there was no payment received that would cover their rent usage.
The State Tax Service did not manage to assure a sufficient control over the economic agents that have real estate in usage or rent, which generates the risk of default of the budget.
Referring to the requirements and recommendations that were not implemented by the central public authorities, the follow-up mission has revealed that:
The insufficient implementation of the recommendations of the Court of Accounts was determined by the inadequate monitoring of the public central authorities regarding the development of the state programs that involve creating the Real Estate Register, bounding the public property terrains, implementing a new system of evaluating and taxing the real estate, as well as by the lack of funds and the lack of desire of the local public authorities to put into practice the recommendations.
Presidency of the Republic of Moldova
The Parliament of the Republic of Moldova
Government of Republic of Moldova
State Register of Legal Acts
Government Open Data Portal
Register of local acts mayors and councils